CJ Corona bares term-share offer

MANILA, Philippines - Chief Justice Renato Corona yesterday confirmed receiving an offer for a term-sharing deal with his former rival for the top judicial post, Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio.

Corona told dwIZ radio that the offer was made to him by Sen. Teofisto “TG” Guingona III at a lunch meeting “sometime last year before the talks of impeachment started filtering out.”

Reporters staked out Carpio’s office at the Supreme Court to get his comment, but were told by his staff that the justice would not comment on Corona’s allegation.

Corona recalled that Guingona, who belongs to the ruling Liberal Party of President Aquino, invited him for lunch at a restaurant.

Corona said he agreed to the meeting since Guingona was his former student in Ateneo law school.

He, however, said he requested the lunch meeting be held in a private place since he was conscious about public appearances.

Corona said they agreed to have lunch at the house of the senator’s father, former Vice President Teofisto Guingona Jr. in New Manila, Quezon City.

“He proposed and asked me, ‘What do you think about retiring early and sharing your term?’ He mentioned specifically Justice Antonio Carpio. He clearly said Justice Carpio,” Corona said over dwIZ.

According to Corona, he declined the offer.

“I told him that it’s against the Constitution. ThereÆs no mention of term-sharing there so that’s not legally possible,” he said.

After giving that answer, Corona said the senator then told him, “Okay, I have to leave for an appointment.”

Months after that meeting, Corona found himself impeached by allies of President Aquino in the House of Representatives in December last year. - By Edu Punay (Philstar News Service, www.philstar.com)

http://ph.news.yahoo.com/cj-bares-term-share-offer-174221168.html

With not much witnesses to prove CJ guilt, prosecution scolded

REUTERS - Members of the prosecution panel, led by Congressman Niel Tupas Jr. (seated), gather during the second day of the impeachment trial of Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona at the Philippine Senate in Manila January 17, 2012. The trial was adjourned Tuesday upon the petition of the prosecution. REUTERS/Bullit Marquez/Pool (PHILIPPINES - Tags: POLITICS CRIME LAW) 




Senator-judges on Day 24 of the impeachment trial told the prosecution team to get their act together and stop relying to the court to do the job for them.

This means the prosecution should produce witnesses on their own instead of requesting subpoena all the time.

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile announced that Senator Antonio Trillanes III already withdrawn his motion to send written questions to Associate Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, saying that it is the prosecution’s responsibility to bring the justice to the impeachment court.

The prosecution wants Sereno to testify on Article VII of the impeachment complaint which accuses Chief Justice Renato Corona of acting in favor of former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo when the Supreme Court issued a temporary restraining order against the government’s hold departure order.

Justice Secretary Leila de Lima earlier testified that Sereno’s dissenting opinion allegedly revealed the irregularities committed by the SC, particularly by Corona, on the issuance of TRO. The court, however, ruled De Lima’s testimonies as hearsay.

Senator-judges advised the prosecution to talk to Sereno first instead of using compulsory process of the impeachment court.

“Bakit hindi niyo muna imbitahin si Justice Sereno? Kayong prosecution dapat kinausap niyo yung gusto niyong testigo at dalhin dito,” Enrile said.

“Nalalagay po kami sa alanganin. Tuwing may gusto kayong tumestigo, hinihingan niyo kami ng subpoena,” Senator Francis Escudero likewise told the prosecution.

Senator Panfilo Lacson added, “Bakit niyo kami isinusubo sa hindi niyo kayang gawin?”

But Bayan Muna Party-list Rep. Neri Colmenares pointed out that the SC resolution, which prohibits justices from testifying in the trial, is preventing them from getting witnesses.

“Reluctant ang witnesses namin kasi siguro si chief justice ang kalaban,” Colmenares added.

“Kung isusubpoena ba namin si Sereno at hindi siya pumayag, inaasahan niyo ba na icocontempt namin siya?” Enrile told Colmenares. “Kaya nagdadahan-dahan ang korteng ito dahil may iniiwasan tayong mangyari.”

Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago noted that the prosecution is putting the Senate in direct collision with the SC.

“Pagisipan muna natin ito! Hindi ito pataasan ng ihi! You are asking us to overturn the Supreme Court. What if she doesn’t follow? Malaking kahihiyan iyon sa impeachment court!” an irked Santiago said.

Senator Joker Arroyo also noted that the prosecution should have no problem getting witnesses.

“I'm amazed by statement of the prosecution that they have difficulty inviting Sereno because the respondent is chief justice. You have the backing of no less that the president of the Philippines. You should have no problem getting witnesses,” Arroyo said.

Santiago further hit the prosecution for declaring earlier that they will present more than a hundred witnesses then later trim them down to 15.

“What on earth were you thinking? Were you playing games with us when you were asked how many witnesses you will present? Were you aiming for trial by publicity? Huwag ninyo kaming lokohin dito!” she yelled at the prosecution.

Santiago also scored the House panel for personally attacking senator-judges for their alleged bias in the trial.

“Are you trying to intimidate the impeachment court into doing what you want? Irespeto niyo ang impeachment court! Huwag kayong umatake ng personal!” she said.

“I think to myself, ‘What will lawyers outside our country think when they read the transcript?’ You are an insult to the intelligence of Filipinos!” Santiago told the prosecution.

She added that she has evidence against a congressman who testified in the court. “I can prove that he is lying under oath. Be careful!”

Meanwhile, defense lead counsel Serafin Cuevas maintained that when the House members filed the impeachment complaint, they had no evidence on hand and was merely doing a fishing expedition in the course of the trial.

“It is our opinion the complaint was haphazardly prepared, railroaded, thrown into the lap of impeachment court,” Cuevas said.

CJ Corona: PHP 1M raffle winner?

Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas on Tuesday denied a bank official's testimonies that they and the Anti-Money Laundering Council were able to access Chief Justice Renato Corona’s bank records.

In its statement, BSP said its examiners did not inspect Corona’s deposit account records contrary to Philippine Savings Bank President Pascual Garcia's statement before the Day 20 impeachment trial.

Garcia told the impeachment court on Monday that Corona’s accounts were among those audited by BSP and AMLC in 2010.

BSP said its examiner, Jerry Leal, who is also a member of the AMLC Specialist Group, only validated if Corona was tagged as a politically exposed persons (PEP) after learning that the chief justice won P1 million in the PSBank’s raffle for its valued account holders.

“On examining PSBank’s PEP list, examiner Jerry Leal saw that the chief justice was not tagged as a PEP,” the BSP said in its statement.

As a result, BSP said PSBank was directed to improve its tagging of PEPs to strengthen its compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering Act.

“BSP examiners therefore could not have copied nor secured copies of such deposit account records of Chief Justice Renato Corona,” the statement added.

The Senate has been investigating the source of the leaked copies of Corona’s bank records, noting that if the prosecution’s documents were illegally obtained, the court would not admit the bank accounts as evidence.

source: http://ph.news.yahoo.com/bsp-denies-inspecting-corona-account.html